Re: Enter, The Bat

From: dzo01 <dzo_at_...>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 23:32:37 -0000

I have to agree with Jeff here, both for logical and story reasons. You don't get an effect like the wind stopping blowing and the fimbulwinter without some serious magical and mythical power being thrown around. Plus, why take away such promising story material as clashing heroquesting????

Yak
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jane Williams
> Sent: Sat Mar 06 14:27:27 2004
> To: whitewall_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Enter, The Bat
>
> --- Gianfranco Geroldi <giangero_at_y...> wrote:
>
> (lots of good stuff!)
>
> > That's why no big Lunar heroquesters are mentioned
> > at
> > WW: it was a military fact for the Lunars and they
> > didn't need heroquesters on the battlefield against
> > a small fortress.
>
> > When this fact becomes clear to Broyan in late 1620,
> > he recognizes his mistake and graciously sends his
> > chief heroquester (Kallyr) away.
>
> Because he didn't want to take unfair advantage? Even
> the most honour-crazed Humakti aren't (often) *that*
> stupid, surely?
>
>
>
> =====
> Jane Williams
>
>
>
>
>

Powered by hypermail