> Does anyone agree that a poll on whether or not the Bat was summoned
> is a good idea. It is a particular nit of mine!
>
> Howabout;
>
> Summons of Evil was Done
>
> Summons of Evil was Done but Bat not expected
>
> Summons of Evil was not Done on this occasion
>
> I leave it to one of the IT bods to sort it out if its a goer!
Technically it can be done, but....
Sadly you're missing an option. If the summons of evil was done, then by
whom? John's idea that it was done, but NOT by Broyan and co, looked
interesting. I can't say I agree with it, but it's an option. An
overlapping option. So that's, erm...
- Summons of Evil done by Broyan & co, Bat expected.
- Summons of Evil done by someone else, Bat expected (and what did
Broyan do to them when he found out??)
- Summons of Evil done by Broyan & co, Bat NOT expected.
- Summons of Evil done by someone else, Bat NOT expected.
- No Summons of Evil.
Though surely we can rule some of those out of court immediately? Who in
their right mind would *deliberately* summon the Bat unless they thought
there was a good chance of beating it? And who would imagine there was
any reasonable chance of beating it?