Re: When did giants lose their Chaos taint?

From: Guy Hoyle <guy.hoyle_at_fPF03ILtjvuHeG0newCfgYUTU7Bxzoh6KW87PG80S9vrNZcW9D4bVU0j6dViRLz8sj>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:10:41 -0600

IIRC, the reference to a Chaotic taint was in error (though it might have been an early Gregging, of course). I recall an errata somewhere that corrected that. Giants are attuned to Disorder, not Chaos. This goes back as early as 2nd edition RQ rulebook.

Guy (Hoyle)

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Lev Lafayette <lev_lafayette_at__KO-WTxyGkE4wcN9NRrUuW4faYFBPUV8EBoKXCLg-qoCX9Hvj7g8a2e6L6axO0X0RYN4GnMqQPS98QxyG1Hg4ycbNnw.yahoo.invalid>wrote:

>
> In first and second editions of RuneQuest, when the game was tied to
> Glorantha, giants were described as a surly and untrustworthy Chaostic race.
>
> However in the famous Cradle scenario the PCs are expected to save a babe
> of this Chaos race - and there's no mention of the taint, iirc*.
>
> So what happened? Are giants Chaotic or not? Or just some of them?
>
> * Yes, I'm about to run the Cradle scenario. Yesterday we played Balastor's
> Barracks :)
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]