Re: A little bit on quaker-ism

From: Trotsky <TTrotsky_at_BSNZr070PsgAcPZ_gnV1RfGhu1bRIQge7Ns8WQzweg_x31LYNmv1PRLQP6fwnFPa-Ih>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:53:55 +0000


Peter Metcalfe wrote:
>
> On 2/25/2011 7:02 AM, Trotsky wrote:
> > It's unlikely there's any close Gloranthan parallel [to the
> Quakers], because the caste
> > system wouldn't make any sense -
> Careful now. It's unlikely there's any close _Malkioni_ parallel.
> Gloranthans can still be monotheists without having the Malkioni caste
> system - just ask the Mostali. As for the warrior caste, the Sedalpists
> of Umathela consider the caste to be polluted and unclean and staff it
> with foreigners and non-Sedalpi while the priestly caste can be replaced
> with a magicians caste just like the Brithini.
>

All seems a bit of stretch to me, although one could always quibble about how 'close' is 'close', which won't really get one anywhere. But did you have some culture in mind?
-- 
Trotsky
Gamer and Skeptic

------------------------------------------------------
Trotsky's RPG website: http://www.ttrotsky.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
Not a Dead Communist: http://jrevell.blogspot.com/
Synapsida: http://synapsida.blogspot.com/



           

Powered by hypermail