Re: Sorcery not malkioni ?

From: jorganos <joe_at_...>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 07:54:10 -0000


Peter Metcalfe:
> Given that I'm denying that mysticism is in the East and is always
> transcendental, I fail to see why this requires mystical magic.

I'm a bit surprised that you include Kabalt in the "needn't be mystical" category - I had the impression that this special attack was to give the victim an unprepared glimpse of the ultimate.            

Powered by hypermail