The Lunars might need to track actions, but they don't bother tracking motivations.
Kharst is subtle and insideous for example. Kharst may be opposed because of criminality and smuggling and abducting the dispossessed to that they can be fed to the monsters in the tunnels under the city. Chaos isn't the problem there, it's what the chaotics do.
On 17 July 2013 10:53, Sergi Díaz <kenrae_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I fail to see why lunars need to track chaos they consider not to be OK.
> They need to track individuals and behaviours they consider not to be OK,
> whether they're chaotic is irrelevant to them.
>
> Regards,
> Sergi
>
>
> 2013/7/17 drscience3000 <dr.dave.00_at_sbcglobal.net>
>
> > **
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Well, I was thinking of a few despicable people (a whole town giving
> over
> > to Malia would be something). And Malia not being chaotic is new to me.
> But
> > if we bow to the depth of your knowledge, it seem clear to me that chaos
> > that Lunars don't think is "OK" can't be counted on to only appear in
> > obvious ways."
> >
> > I should have said in the last sentence is it "still" seems clear. Ie,
> > regardless of whether worshiping Malia is chaotic, the question still
> comes
> > down to, is all chaos obvious? If not, then the Lunars have a need to
> track
> > chaos they consider not to be OK, but which is subtle.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
Powered by hypermail