rules clarifications?

From: Goihl & Fahey <glorantha-board_at_rpglist.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 21:56:39 +0200


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C32ED2.00F56D40 Content-Type: text/plain;

        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>>>... CF **, 2 CF *, or 3 CF. Could be kind of cool."
>>=20
>> Maybe I misunerstood ?
>
>No, I _did_ suggest this. BUT, I suggested it as a single unit that
>was an exception to the normal rules. It sounded like Daniel
>was discussing making this something general for all the
>praxian missile users, and I wanted to make it clear that this
>was not my intention. If I misunderstood you Daniel, sorry!

Oh, I assumed you, Stephen, were suggesting a new rule whereby missile = units could choose to use their CFs and missile factors interchangably. = I thot that has merit. So I misunderstood. But a new unit or units which = did this could be good. Either way, or both. Does seem to fit Sable tho. = Anyway, no problems misunderstanding here as we are just suggesting new = rules or optional alterations. If anyone can use anything it's good.

Daniel

------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C32ED2.00F56D40 Content-Type: text/html;

        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>&gt;&gt;&gt;... CF **, 2 CF *, or 3 CF. Could be kind of =
cool."<BR>&gt;&gt;=20
<BR>&gt;&gt; Maybe I misunerstood ?<BR><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>&gt;</FONT><BR>&gt;No, I _did_ suggest this. BUT, I suggested = it as a=20
single unit that</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;was an exception to the normal rules. It sounded like =
Daniel</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;was discussing making this something general for all the</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;praxian missile users, and I wanted to make it clear that =
this</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;was not my intention. If I misunderstood you Daniel, =
sorry!</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Oh, =
I assumed you,=20
Stephen,&nbsp;were&nbsp;suggesting a new rule whereby&nbsp;missile units = could=20
choose to use their CFs and missile factors interchangably. I thot that = has=20
merit. So I misunderstood. But&nbsp;a new unit or units which did this = could be=20
good. Either way, or both. Does seem to fit Sable tho. Anyway, no = problems=20
misunderstanding here as we are just suggesting new rules or optional=20 alterations. If anyone can use anything it's good.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Daniel</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C32ED2.00F56D40--

Powered by hypermail