I'm clearly missing something, somewhere. ;-)
> I move that Shamans of Pamalt be allowed to sacrifice for
> Pamalt's special Rune spells only. And that they NOT be acolytes, but
> their own category of membership, which is considered equal in status
> to acolytehood. Howzat?
<lifts right index finger slowly in appropriate mime>
Works for me. While we're on the subject, what is the social role of acolytes, and does anyone have a more evocative title? Are they quasiautonomous "priestly" types, or essentially magical cronies of the chief?
Alex.
Powered by hypermail