History vs Myth

From: jonas.schiott_at_vinga.hum.gu.se
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1994 15:32:40 +0100


David Cake:

>But I do not
>think that heroquesting should change mundane history - the moving finger,
>and all that.

[...]
>Mythic history, yes, but the whole point is that that is myth,
>and myth is always of the present, even if allegedly in the past.

That's a really short quote, so I can say "Yeah, I agree", can't I? In fact I would like to say something a bit stronger: Dave, you are 99% correct and I will personally flame anyone who says otherwise! :-)
What's the missing 1%? Well, I think you should have avoided the term "mythic history" - even if you explain that it isn't _really_ history as such, it could confuse the issue. Minor point.

To those who might have missed it, this is the same thing I was going on about a few days (or was it weeks?) ago when I wrote something to the effect that "the Gods are lousy historians", meaning that the gods know about myth, 'cause that's where they live, but not about the realm of Time, 'cause that's off-limits to them.
Someone raised the objection that gods know everything their worshippers have told them in prayer, so they should have some knowledge of past events.
OK, first of all this information is (of course) purely subjective and biased. Secondly, why would a devotee of a deity mention such mundane things as what year it is or who is King at the time the prayer is said? Why would he/she bother the deity with those everyday, self-evident facts that an historian would be most interested in? Thirdly, I would claim that as the god has no temporal consciousness, it is at a loss to say how long ago a certain prayer was uttered, or even the sequence in which information was given to it. Fourthly, deities will tend to have their own interpretations of events, compounded of mundane information from worshippers and mythic repercussions. For them, the myth will have precedence. If something some priest said contradicts it, well, mortals _are_ fallible... I could go on, but my attention span is approaching its limit.

So, anyway: history and myth are two different views of events (the world, reality...), sometimes complementary, sometimes exclusive, but always different. Don't get them confused.

(      Jonas Schiott                                   )
(      Institutionen for Ide- och lardomshistoria      )
(      Goteborgs Universitet                           )


------------------------------

Powered by hypermail