>I agree with your first proposition: that the god learners weren't =
>wrong; but I do have a semantic quibble with your second: that they were =
>much too "right".
>
>The god learners attempt to impose their "translation" of other =
>culture's mythic-languages was extremely useful but ultimately =
>counter-productive.
OK, how about this: the GLs were dangerously "right" because they came close to fixating the universe in their paradigm, which would have squashed all the others.
Nils W | Here we are! Office: niwe_at_einku.ericsson.se | We sail on a ship made of dreams.Home: nilsw_at_ibm.net
Powered by hypermail