Will this Invasion discussion never end? Hope not.

From: Erik Sieurin <BV9521_at_utb.hb.se>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 13:30:59 +0100


Ken Rolston:
> Your identification of your player characters as borderline nut
cases is also familiar and persuasive. I much enjoyed the entire treatment.
Thankyou. An important point is that the _players_ are fully aware of their characters being borderline nutcases and quite different from normal humanity.
Time for a minor babbling.
You know, there's been some skirmishes between the "farm boy squad" and the "heroic fantasy squad" out there. I've run the middle road: The PC's are exceptional people, capable of heroic derring-do, but the majority of their surroundings are more interested in harvest and the local girls. The background is as much Low Fantasy as possible, while the PC's and their main adversaries are clearly Heroic Fantasy. This puts the PC's in a position where the players are much more aware of how exceptional they are, both in capability and in psyche. In other words, they are much more aware of being Heroes (not necessarily in the ethical sense of the word). This enhances the enjoyment of play for the group.

Jorganos the Archer makes extremely valid points about the causes and effects of the Invasion. It doesn't matter how benevolent the Empire is on its home front; its invasions are still a major pain in the ass for the invaded. As a side-note, MY modern-day equivalent of the Lunar Empire has always been the United States of America; a basically good-natured world power with mostly admirable ideals, who despite that have commited atrocities both outside and within its own borders.

Erik Sieurin


Powered by hypermail