>What is the chances of finding new people such as the poster. When at the
>minute the only two ways to get into Glorantha and RQ is to have email and
>stumble across the digests or find a copy of Tales buried in a game store.
Or just play RQ. Lots of roleplayers I know have played, know of, or possess RuneQuest. they might not be Gloranthaphiles but they sometimes run the system and that was how I got involved in Glorantha, a one-off scenario in Apple Lane that turned into a full blown campaign.
>Your probably saying why the hell does he not do something about it. How
>can anyone do anything when there is nothing concrete to fall back on. My
>god there will probably be a thread about which end of a worm is female.
Wot?
> There needs to be some sort of offical word, from somone who has their
>feet somewhere near the ground.
And BUTTS would be chopped Broo liver then would it? We don't need an official word, just because someone works at Chaosium or AH and says that RQ and Glorantha should be wholeheartedly supported doesn't make it so. All we need are more of the same things as Tales, or Conventions, or even just Web Pages dedicated to RQ.
I'm not slandering you, or hurling abuse, but you seem a little defeatist. I am a new addition to the hoards of Gloranthan lovers, having only played for two years, so to that shows that the system isn't relegated to those who just started playing it in RQ II edition. Also, I would point to the English magazine Arcane, which seemingly gives a lot of support and more than a few mentions to RQ. Perhaps the new RQ will be a breath of ife to the system. Although I am intrested in Greg's Nail in the Coffin, whatever that is.
>RQ RIP
As I said, defeatist.
Nick E.
- -------------------------------------------------Nick the Shaman of Thed E-Mail:wal_at_eff.u-net.com
I thought Britain was Dorastor without broo, but then Sandy made it all clear to me.
- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Powered by hypermail