Whankers again

From: Karin Goihl / Daniel Fahey <goihlk_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 09:26:58 +0100


Nick Effingham wrote:

Their problem is that there's no way they could figure out how to convert their mythological idealism and inconsequential soul searching changes via almost delusionary storylines into anything that even resembles roleplaying...in other words, they're being pretentios whankers...

Do we really need even more kids who don't know anything about a subject insulting others who do their thing? There has been enuf of this on the digest. Nick, if you don't want to deal with something there's not much reason for you to call people who do "whankers". Let them do it. Also your statement is incorrect. If people try to figure out a way to do something they eventually will. Also your weird derogatory statement includes a description of what many people have been doing in therapy for years. Someone else's soul searching is not nesessarily inconsequential just because you can't relate to it. What is mythological idealism? Please don't answer that. Work on your own problems Nick. Writing of your misunderstanding and intolerant judgements of others is only degrading to yourself. There. Now we just need someone to pull me off my High Llama. Daniel


Powered by hypermail