LOREN THE LIST (emeritus):
>Please, do me a favor. If you have a detail of Gloranthan minutae
>that hasn't seen daylight since Avalon Hill got its grubby hands on
>RQ, then don't expect anybody to take it as gospel. You have to
>re-establish it as likely all over again. You have to take a trip to
>the well of knowledge, and MAKE A REASON UP why it should be true in
>our Gloranthas.
This is of course heartily seconded. If stuff isn't in-print, it's ipso
facto *not* official material *now*, and can thus not be used to establish
'facts' about the Glorantha of today.
- -----------------
Michael Raaterova
<.sig omitted on legal advice>