I think you missed the point. I, at least, and maybe Loren too, would like
people to give a little more informations than just "Go read page 23 line
32 of <insert your own fanzine out of print for 12 years> you moron", with
the underlying assumption that if I don't have access to that fanzine, then
I am worth squatt because I am not part of the "inner circle".
How about: "page 23 of <insert your own fanzine out of print for 12 years>
suggested that <explaination or quotation>, and for that reason I believe
that the answer of your question is <whatever>...
And if you really want to please me, but I am afraid it's to much to ask,
you could add: "In game terme, I would translate that as <insert
interesting/usefull rule relevant to the subject>"...
The result is the same, but I, at least, would probably use a lot less the
little slider on the side of my message window. Nobody denies the interest
and/or usefullness of old material. The point is, if you cannot get it, a
reference only is worth squatt...
All of this is IMHO of course.
Frederic
Powered by hypermail