> Sorry Alex, I really couldn't comment.
Well, I can't say I'm disappointed, as I did _not_ ask the above. Messy legal post mortems aren't among my (many) vices. I'm particularly confused at this point, as the other quoted comments _were_ mine (thought the >'s are different, and can't have been from the same message, either).
And to my actual comment says the problem wasn't approval, but:
> AH/Chaosium thing re Glorantha/RQ reared it's ugly
> head and so we didn't know where we stood in this regard, again we got no
> clarification of position
Ah, I can understand Chaosium dragging their heels about _that_. Have you considered a de-RQ'd version, or would that entirely disembowel it? Or is that (part of) what Chaosium were nonforthcoming about?
> (bearing in mind what happened to [yet another Dan] Prentice who was
> threatened with legal action by Avalon Hill. (I hope you've got a lot of
> pipes, Alex ;) )
Sadly not! Pipe-playing and haggis-eating are two areas in which I'm unreconditely unpatriotic (in both Scotland and Sartar, to paraphrase Sam P).
However, even I know that "O Danny Prentice" doesn't scan.
The One True,
Alex.
Powered by hypermail