I'd agree with the others that have said this isn't a "hard-core subjectivist" position at all, really, at least in the terms of the foregoing discussion/raging debate. In fact, you seem to be saying that the gods are, effectively, "objectively real", just that they _became_ real by a process that had lots of humans (and others) in the loop.
There are really several separate questions here, though they tend to be lumped together in practice:
The gods are (objectively/subjectively) experiencable.
The "history" of the gods, in general or in particular (does/does not) correspond to their mythology.
The gods are eternal and unchanging, vs. the gods are (wholely/partly) (artifacts of/created by) (belief/worship/other).
Obviously these choices interact, so some permutations might be very confusing, untenable, or imply very strange Gloranthas.
My much (applauded/reviled) Five Point Scale only addressed the first of these questions, since that was (if anyone remembers that far back) what was originally at issue. Doubtless if we had a scale for the others as well, we'd end up with a different combination for every Digester (except for large pools of "asleep", "don't care", and "voted for more than one candidate").
Softly, softly,
Alex.
Powered by hypermail