Re: Glorantha Digest V4 #537

From: Michael Cule <mikec_at_room3b.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 14:19:55 +0100


>There seems to be some level of consensus that HeroQuests require
>large scale backing to be successful, counted in numbers of keen
>worshippers along for the spiritual ride. Do people agree on this?
>Being something of a Michel Moorcock, 'kill the gods' (eg. Elric or
>Corum) fan, I like the idea that individuals can act without the
>support of huge cults. You could argue that a figure like Elric,
>being a figure of legend in his own time, has the tacit or
>subconscious support of much of his world. To phrase it another
>way - is renown or 'legendary status' a good substitute for
>followers or fellow initiates?

Hum. Well, yes you can't just go out and alter the basic structure of the cosmos without some support. So normally you need lots of people back home pushing spiritual power down the line to you.

But Cule's Third Rule of HeroQuests states:

All rules have exceptions.

And Harrek, who as far as I can tell gutted and bound the Polar Bear God without the slightest support from anyone, may be one of the exceptions. So may Androgeus.

>
>I would also argue against a one-to-one mechanic for calculating the
>support you get per worshipper because big empires always win that way
>which is boring. Can anyone comment? For example, a lot of bored Dara
>Happans secure within the support of the empire might provide a lot
>less HQ boosting that a bunch of desperate Sartarites? So - readers of
>the recent runes (new GS books)- consult your sources and illuminate
>me!

Well, it depends on circumstances. People whose homes are about to be overwhelmed by enemies are liable to sacrifice more of their spiritual power to save themselves than people sitting comfortably at home being asked to back up the latest campaign on some far away border.

But remember, knowledge is as important as power and where you strike is as important as how hard.

Powered by hypermail