POW vs CON

From: Dr M. D. Lay <michael.lay_at_ctsu.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 12:22:18 GMT


Sergio:
>do we really need power and magic points? IMO be don't. Instead
>of Power we should use Constitution and instead of MP we
>should use Hit Points or Fatigue.

So we would end up with powerful sorcerors that look like Arnold Schwarzenegger (sp?). Frankly I do not like the concept that a powerful sorceror should have the constitution of an elephant. Nor do I see that an Orlanthi should cripple himself in order to cast bladesharp 4 (4 points of damage ex 3-4 is a big chunk).

And as for fatigue, well, it was the first rule out of the window when I started up my recent game. We prefer a "you do something absurd and the GM penalises you" system.

Personally I *like* the concept that physically weak characters can be magically powerful. Or indeed that powerful warriors can be felled by the wave of a Challanna Arroy priestess' hand. I like the fact that those who concentrate on the magical arts have to rely on their warrior comrades and vice versa.

Essentially I am against anything that concentrates over reliance on one statistic. I think that the overlap of CON/SIZ/STR could usefully be addressed, but I do not feel that there should be any overlap between the physical and magical stats.

Mike Lay

- -------------------------

michael.lay_at_ctsu.ox.ac.uk
<Help! My computer's disintegrating! The operating system's in 32 bits!>

Powered by hypermail