Re: The Glorantha Digest V5 #227

From: Mr. Tines <tines_at_windsong.demon.co.uk>
Date: 17 Nov 1997 21:38 +0000


###

Stephen Martin
(Voriof)
> Given that the Orlanthi started out as shepherds rather than farmers (or
> so I gather), the lack of importance of Voriof does seem strange. I think
> this is a cultural reflection of the myths about Varnaval, the original
> Shepherd God from whom Voriof learned his ways.

This is a new name to me (or at least one that does not spring to mind). Does this indicate that I've not adequately committed _KoS_ to wetware, or is it from some other arcana?

Pam Carlson:
(Witches and wise men)
> That seems to me to be largely a western sterotype (in the RW), and one I
> reject as universal in Glorantha - particularly for the Heortlings.

If the general run of Orlanthi traits don't scream out as a melange of north-western European cultures, I don't know what does. In that case, I think we are doomed to talk past each other.

> I view it like science. The old theory has been disproven. Get over it
> and get on with new theories.

Rather, new data were discovered, as, for example confirmation of one of the significant "discoveries" of our c1981 _Borderlands_ campaign, that Orlanth was Sartar's "Church of England".

> Don't worry - I didn't like it at first, either. (Heck, years ago I
played
> a cheerfully deranged BG who challenged Humakti for fun!) But once I saw
> how much more opportunity for campaign depth the new material offered, I
> was hooked!

I think we may find our depths in different directions.

Nick Brooke:
> Nice work on the potatoes, BTW!

I don't know. I get malicious and tricksterous, and that's the bit that I get a good word for.

Better than nowt, I suppose.

### end pegwit v8 signed text
08ea1fed5365bfedcb9a3f3202786595f9e44223ed9139faa8f07f1fef8c 216c289fc74f19118292c810c56648a82fdaa320eab03fddee8249e77281


Powered by hypermail