> I was under the impression that this spell affected emotional state of
> reasoning creatures (i.e. those with free INT in rules terms).
> If I were an intelligent creature and I saw a broo approaching with a glint
> in his eye, then I would be off if I wasn't sure of the outcome of a fight.
> Of course the other problem with using befuddle from the broo point of view,
> is the fact that its effects are dispelled as soon as any act of aggression
> occurs against the victim.
Broos certainly have better version of such an useful spell. If you need it, you gotta get it! I think that the broos drive animals towards other broos, who have prepared their spells in advance, and are ready to rock and roll. And does a saurus get hurt when a tiny little broo does its evil deeds, I wonder?
> Now if you're talking about a Mindblast, then that might work. Don't know
> the workings of that bloody corrupt Lunar magic, but I wouldn't put it past
> that lot to teach a broo anything.
Why did you think that Ralzakark would tolerate the Empire, then?-)
The opinions have been changed to protect the innocent.
Panu 'Passo' Pasanen.
Powered by hypermail