RQ3 errata

From: were.ralph <were.ralph_at_virgin.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 20:45:18 -0800


Kevin Rose says:
>Sorcery seems
>to make a lot more sense and is a viable system using his rules. At the
>very least you need the errata for RQ3, as it fixes a bunch of horrible
>sorcery problems.

How can I get hold of these errata, I've only recently decided to switch from RQ2 to RQ3, and it would be useful to see these before we go too far.

Thanks
Ralph Plowman


Powered by hypermail