>Oh! What a lovely idea.... I *must* steal this....
Feel free Michael, I was planning on including this in a scenario, but first wanted everyones opinion (or at least those with an opinion ;-)) on the validity of the idea.
>Is the familiar under the Thanatari's control? Only if the Thanatari
>knows enough about sorcerers to ask the question....
Or if the familiar was one that had been released from service and therefore was not known of by the Thanatari when he took the sorcerer, or he/she did not have time to check before something untoward came up, or he/she was not thorough enough.
>And BTW, I would say that if the Familiar gets hooked up with another
sorcerer >before all the Stat bonuses given by the old it gets to keep the old stuff as well as >keeping the new.
Hmm.... I'm not sure about the former, would the enchantment be broken until all of the STATS have gone? If not then I'm sure that using Sandys' rules the enchantment can be manipulated if this procedure is known by the new sorcerer. Otherwise I was thinking that something akin to the resurrection rules might apply i.e. any skills related to the STAT lost will deteriorate from the point of loss of that STAT until the STAT is regained.
I would suggest that if the STAT is INT, then spells memorised would deteriorate to the level that could be store by the Fixed INT (randomly) and these would not be recoverable upon recovery. The skills in those spells would however be recoverable and so if a lost spell is re-learned the creature would start at its original skill levels (minus any loss through deterioration due to time between STAT loss and regaining).
Powered by hypermail