illuminated geases

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_voyager.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 10:41:02 +1300 (NZDT)


Nikk Effingham:

>I was thinking about the nature of Vows and Ilumination. D:LoD speaks
>of extra power for Illumination - does anyone believe that
>Illumination can allow a sorceror under Sandy's rule system to ignore
>their Vows like Geases are ignored.

There's a bit of a dichometry about this for the illuminated lunars are known to have geases too (they are called renunciations and penances). So breaking a geas or vow shouldn't be an automatic consequence of illumination IMO.

Powered by hypermail