OK, bad analogy, I was just trying to say that just because a particular term is used, does not inherently prove that a) another thing by the same name is the same, or b) another thing by a different name is different. Illumination and Enlightenment are similar enough words that they can be confused with each other (I think they both imply shedding light on a subject). The analogy I chose was that if a priest has a familiar, it doesn't mean that he is a sorceror, just that the term "familiar" is used outside of it's RQ3 rulebook context.
I didn't think I was playing nasty rhetorical tricks, just expressing an opinion. I wasn't trying to illuminate the digest, just enlighten it. :-)
http://members.tripod.com/~PhilHibbs/
You never know what is enough
unless you know what is more than enough.
Powered by hypermail