To reiterate a point I made earlier, wouldn't it be much simpler and
as near equivalent as needs be (given that the sum of the skill number and
status point total has not been constant throughout the playtest) to simply
represent the skill by *one* number, and have that equal both the number you
have to roll *below* and the number of status points you start with (which,
for an equivalent skill would give you one more status point), so that
10/10, 6/14 and 18W/2(22)
would then be represented as 11, 15, and 3W (with the W indicating an extra
20 SPs as well as the bump-up)? Or does this not fulfill the need for
obfuscatory representations?
>David Dunham <mailto:dunham_at_pensee.com>
>Glorantha/RQ page: <http://www.pensee.com/dunham/glorantha.html>
- --
Doesn't the fact that there are *exactly* 50 states seem a little suspicious?
George W. Harris gharris_at_mindspring.com ------------------------------
End of The Glorantha Digest V6 #229
Powered by hypermail