>A. doesn't _manifest_ within the cosmos, though
>he's in some sense "mystically knowable" from within it, which I
>think is a very different proposition.
I refer you to the Vithelan Creation Myth where Durapdur becomes aware of the measures of Time, Space and Consciousness and perceives a lesser version of himself within those measures, Atrilith. Ergo Atrilith was manifested within the Cosmos.
NW>>>I have no problem with westerners somehow>>>Gloranthan metaphysicists to agree that they are equals,
>>>equating Vith and Zzabur, but you wouldn't get enlightened
Me>> This is giving supremacy to the mystical perspective, an error.
>If we read Nils as saying that this is what _Eastern_ 'enlightened
>Gloranthan metaphysicists' (and their symps) say, then I agree with
>him.
In which case they would be crap metaphysicians.
Powered by hypermail