That's actually what I meant: true as in working and internally consistent. But, since conflicting views are equally working and consistent, I maintain that they are interpretations of something which is just beyond sight. We are talking myth after all.
> > Chaos is one denomination for forces of destruction and
> > corruption, but it's just a label.
>
> More specifically, Chaos is pretty much any sort of extra-cosmic
> phenomena, which have an unfortunate tendancy to show up _as_ destruction
> and corruption.
I'd say extra-cosmic is one explanation _why_ they show up as gut-wrenching corruption. Saying that chaos _is_ extra-cosmic gives precedence to the Orlanthi/ Praxian view.
Powered by hypermail