The lunars then exist (partially at least) in the same cultural sphere as the orlanthi and the praxians insofar as recognizing the same definition/explanation of chaos.
But, saying that chaos and its definition in itself is a universal constant is saying that the easterners are wrong, which goes against the basics of Gloranthan metaphysics.
Alex F:
>
>Then everyone would more or less agree that those horrors identified
>by the Orlanthi as 'chaotic' have some sort of 'extra-cosmic'
>ultimate origin.
I disagree. The East Islanders didn't even know of such a distinction until they heard visitors from the west talk of it. I'm sure there is stuff in the East Isles that an Orlanthi would call chaotic. I don't think an Islander would agree that it is extracosmic. Since a chaos thingie, like a broo for example, is not the Ultimate it is part of the world to the Islander, including the chaotic part of it.
>Mystical traditions say the 'extra-cosmic' is rather 'the transcendent'.
>Orlanthi then get a deep, deep worried, and somewhat perplexed frown, and
>then say "Illuminant! Kill!!". ;-)
I disagree again. I don't think you can make a parallell between extra-cosmic (as in Orlanthi chaos definition) and the transcendent (or ultimate or what you prefer to call it). The nasties called chaotic are very clearly _not_ transcendent.
Alex F:
>
>> I'm just
>> saying that beyond the different cultural trappings,
>> there is a single layer of "reality". Since nobody
>> knows the whole "truth", you get different interpretations
>> of it. They are all right because nobody of them is.
>
>You haven't demonstrated any basic contradiction on this between _any_
>viewpoints yet, so I disgree that we need employ such handwaving at
>_this_ particular point.
Disagreement noted. I'll shut up before we start discussion objective vs subjective.
Powered by hypermail