>Of course, simply because someone no longer exists on heaven, earth or
>hell is not proof per se that they were destroyed by (what would be
>seen in cultural terms as) Chaos. Some different possible takes/
>circumstances:
>
>Theist/naturalist: He was eaten by chaos.
Same thing.
>Mystical:
>
>He was Liberated from the mundane world into a higher state of being;
Arguably the same thing, or it's complete opposite. Or both.
>or:
>
>A misuse of great mystic powers caused his annihilation.
IMHO basicaly annihilation by chaos. One of the risks of mysticism.
>'Materialist':
>
>He simply dispersed, being dead, and not having his soul trapped by
>pagan demons.
Dispersed is ok, inthat the substance from which it was formed still exists, albeit in a different form.
>or:
>
>He went to Solace.
And therefore still exists - in Solace.
Simon Hibbs
End of The Glorantha Digest V6 #554
Powered by hypermail