>Simon Hibbs
>>I believe such paradoxes can be
>>> found in each of the major philosophies. These paradoxes
>>> do not disprove the philosphies that give rise to them,
>>> but are evidence that they are not complete.
>
> I mention only for interests sake that according to a very loose
>interpretation of Godels theorem (cf Godel Escher Bach, etc), completeness
>and containing paradoxes actually go together. Containing no paradoxes is a
>proof of incompleteness.
Touche!
Simon Hibbs
Powered by hypermail