Re: Meddling between Eric and Alex

From: Eric Rowe <rowe_at_chaosium.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 12:52:39 -0700


>Eric, I realize that all this speculation can seem obtuse and non-productive t
>o you, seeing as you are closer to the development process. Speaking only for
>myself, Alex's questions seem just fine, even though I like what I have seen i
>n HW so far (or, have less questions, anyway).

You're probably quite right, but I kept seeing derogatory phases like pointlessly, dubious, and iffy in his comments, which do not seem like questions either. Since some people take his posts as authoritarian on what the rules say so I feel a need to combat misinformation.

>>Why can't you assume that the rules will work?
>The obvious answer is: he is not sure they will.
>I have faith in Robin's initial design, as well as Greg's (and whoever else is
> involved) abilities as developer(s). But I still want to ask questions and di
>scuss issues.

That is fine, but if you have a copy of the rules and are a playtester, or just need something clarified, then you should be asking questions and discussing issues with Greg first. Posting to this list won't make changes to the rules, e-mailing Greg will.

Eric


Powered by hypermail