I've got to read more often on weekends... I just plowed through 220k of
text files...
Anyway, back to the issues:
================================
DARA HAPPAN VS. LUNAR SOCIETY
>> If the DHn culture is really as sexist and patriarchal as
>> I described it, one can just imagine the collision between it and
>> Lunar culture (which, after all, is majority female in terms of the
>> gods it worships).
> It's not so much a collision as an a case of adoptionism, mind you.
> There are some 'non-Lunarised' Dara Happans, and a handful of
> stridently 'Lunar' fellahs who're no more Dara Happan than your or
> I, but the overlap and blurring between the two strikes me as pretty
> considerable.
I'm curious on this point... looking beyond just gender and sexuality,
on the broader point of culture, is it pretty much the consensus of
this Digest that there isn't strong division between these two groups?
Is there is division, what form does it take?
===================================
JOHN HUGHES WEIGHS IN (also: ritual homosexuality)
Ok, I'm floored. Thanks, John.
On the point of types of homosexuality: I just (ok, a few months ago)
read an excellent book with a title along the lines of 'Bisexuality in
Greece and Rome'. The discussion of Greece corresponds closely to the
first model John mentions, '1. Age structured homosexuality', but Rome
doesn't quite fit any of the 3. Essentially, (classical Republican)
Rome had a 'Power structured homosexuality', wherein a male citizen
had the power to do more-or-less anything he wanted to any
non-citizen, male or female, with essentially no moral opprobrium.
Regards,
Theo
------------------------------
Powered by hypermail