Chris Bell wrote:
> The convo turned to Pharoah, and Greg's plans for an Esrolia supplement
that
> would detail the Holy Country during the Hero Wars and after the death of
> Pharoah. I mentioned that some player groups would probably try to perform
> something like the Lighbringer's Quest to recover all the parts of the
> Pharaoh from the various Lunar Hells and restore him as the rightful ruler
> of Esrolia. Greg told me that Pharoah was not coming back, at all, for
what
> he had planned. Well, I asked him, what about other people's Glorantha's?
>
> "I'm not interested in other people's Gloranthas."
>
> On that, I reserve my opinion and take no side. Nick, Mob, et al... Take
> that for what you will.
Come on, he only wanted to say that he can not support anybodys Glorantha, but only one (his) Glorantha, and that in his Glorantha the Pharao is out of the future.
If do you want to use the Pharao in your Glorantha you say undirectly:
"I am not interessted in the "official" Glorantha."
Is it more worse that an author and publisher canīt be in line with all the Gloranthas of his fanīs, or that a "fan" doesnīt want to be in line with the "official" line?"
Nobody will blame you if you will not play the "official" Glorantha, but please be so fair to allow Greg to continue to publish his Glorantha, without careing to much about other peoples Glorantha.
As much as this sounds like a supporting statement for Martin in the RE
discussion: It is NOT!
"Never fix a running system!" a proverb says.
The RMM runs (almost) perfect; also with Gregs vision of the Lunar Empireīs
future.
MGMV Cheers
Andre
Powered by hypermail