>Me>> "In most RW cases [religious proposition] X
> >>in fact had far-reaching social implications."
>The doctrinal split I was referring to was that between the
>Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox churches, not Arianism.
>What 'far-reaching social implications' did either belief have?
In which case, you were referring to the filioque controversy (i.e. "...the holy spirit proceeds from the Father _and the Son_"), not the homo[i]ousios controversy that you originally wanted an answer for.
I should point out that I did say "most", not "all".
Powered by hypermail