I realize this statement is unnecessarily dismissive and wish to soften it.
I actually agree that a soviet analogy has some value under the right
interpretation and circumstances.
My primary objection is to the level of reality that is borne along with
the analogy.
That is, some material is fine for playing with, fine for joking around
with and fine for a narrator to use; but is inappropriate as a model for
the way that I see Glorantha. I don't care what anyone does in their own
game. The inclusion of regimental commissars is fine for a lrp, for your
game and (should I wish to do so) fine for my own game as well. But in
Glorantha there is no such thing. Sure some sort of analog may exist, but
the vocabulary wouldn't be used in an official publication because it would
ruin the atmosphere I have determined to try to hold.
Part of my job is to offer the most appropriate models. I am not obliged to
agree that bad models suit me. Authors should be forewarned that we don't
want it used as an analogy for submitted material. I need to define things
in a manner that will allow Issaries to move ahead with its exploration and
exposure of Glorantha. This one won't make my job easier. Tarsh Wars is a
fun play and Chris, Nick and Dan deserve commendation for the fun play it
provides. But it's analogies and vocabulary are not appropriate for
Glorantha as I see it.
Powered by hypermail