>Me>My view was that the Kings are the Queen's Lovers.
> My view is the implication of KOS pg 174, where his wife's
>lovers are incited by the King, is that the King is not one of his
>own wife's lovers, or at the very least has good reason to
>acknowledge and not object to their existence.
But according to KoS p201, there are multiple Kitori kings. So the "wife's lovers" are also Kings.
> >I don't
> >think for a barbarous tribe such as the Kitori that they
> >would be satisfied with "symbolic" marriages.
> Troll culture uses symbolism at other points
They do?
>(and its possible the symbolic marriage is
>consummated, but not regularly or by preference).
In which case it's no longer symbolic.
Powered by hypermail