RE: Canonical Lunar names

From: Posselt, Theo (US - Foster City) <"Posselt,>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:37:42 -0500

 

> ------------------------------
> From: "Nick Brooke" <Nick_Brooke_at_btinternet.com>
>
> Theo writes:
>
> > Well, we really haven't have that many 'official' lunar
> names at all.
> > Most of the latin ones, to my knowledge, come from Reaching Moon.
>
> Your knowledge is evidently somewhat lacking.
>
> <proof from canonical sources snipped>
>
> This is *not* a Megacorp innovation, by any means.
>
> Time for another Damascene conversion?

Yep, the scales have fallen from my eyes. I was wrong, wrong, wrong on this. No offense intended to the fine people of reaching moon.

BTW, what was my other conversion?

Hey, I never claimed to be an expert. That's why my final line on that section of my post was:

> But no doubt someone can quickly prove me wrong.

And lo, someone did.

Theo

Theo
- - This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. - If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


End of The Glorantha Digest V8 #429


Powered by hypermail