>In one way, he killed *himself* by performing the Severance from
>Kin ritual.
Better to say: Humakt IS severance, and it was manifest even in the
severance from kin ritual.
>But the difference between metaphor and mythic truth
>is a little blurred here (A Good Thing IMO) ...
Myth is metaphor. Every meaningful statement, image or feeling from a myth
means several things at once.
>> I'm not aware of any written myths of Humakt slaying chaos - at least not
>> comparable to those of Urox - but his followers would doubtless know some.
I do not think the core hUmakt has any anti-chaos bias. It just isn't an enemy of Death. However, many subcults (being part of Orlanthi society) adopt and help the general Orlanthi social system, which fears chaos.
>> > 3) if he was dead, then he must have been resurrected along with
>> > eveyone else during the compromise.
>
>I don't think so. I think that he is both dead and living at the same
>time. He certainly wasn't resurrected.
>
>What he actually did (according to the Sword of Life myths) was
Julian makes a good response after this.
Please understand that this sort of raisin gof a deity to such High God
knowledge is the kind of belief and practice that an initiate of that deity
would have. Non-humakti don't beleive that EVERYTHING hinged on Humakt, but
the initiates who have started their experiences with the secrets start to
learn those things.
>It's simply what he does.
Actualli, what he IS.
>He separates the living from the dead.
End of The Glorantha Digest V8 #491
Powered by hypermail