And then the game was up as far as the
theists
>were concerned because Humct wasn't any kind of deity they could
recognise,
>but a peice of sorcerous nonsense that had been foisted on them for
who
>knows what reasons.
Sez Simon:
>Have you any reason to believe that any theists have ever had Humct
foisted
>on them? Humct is a western explanation for theist religious beliefs,
not
>an attempt to manipulate those beliefs.
I thought the GL were trying to manipulate theist beleifs. The idea (as I understood it) of their taking such an interest in the myths and legends of the barbarians of the various Thelayan cultures was initially knowledge for it's own sake, later used to try and pacify them under the rule of the Middle Sea Empire. I have seen references to the worship of a St Humct in Ralios, and the doomed attempt to analyse tricksters in Slontos to create/understand the god Errml. Then there were the False Gods - why did they do it? And the write up of Hsunchen on the Issaries site says that the GL influence made their religions a little more standardised, though whether this was done deliberately or accidentally as a result of introducing them to each other it doesn't say. Then there is the False Dragon Ring and the School of Immanent Mastery in Kralorea, deifinitely an attempt to synthesise a manipulable version of local beleifs to control the subject peoples, and the cult of Caladra and Aurelion was made for a reason. Just an experiment? Or an attempt to pacify the warlike Caladralanders? Humct may not be part of this, but why St Humct in Ralios? As a henotheist area it should be St Humakt surely?
On the other hand Worlath is described by Western sources as pre Dawn wizard who tried to corner the powers of Storm, and they say nothing about trying to introduce him to the barbarians as a potential deity. And places in western Maniria are desribed as having a Makioni aristocracy and a theist peasantry whose beleifs are ignored and considered irrelevant.
I would speculate that the sprawling Middle Sea Empire tried various approaches and had no unified unbeleiver policy.
Powered by hypermail