Which demonstrates the dual to your statement of a short while ago: to wit, Gloranthan magical reality isn't completely "objective" either, at least in a strong reductionist sense. (Which seems to me obvious in the first place. "Gee, that must be why they call it magic...")
> (at least to themselves).
Well, if they can "prove" it in a way that's magically effective, that's good enough for me.
Powered by hypermail