>You're telling me flat out that for any _single_ animal, it can only
>be "correctly explained" in one magical system. If it's an "animist
>animal", then the theists need hardly bother having a myth for it at all,
>since they'll ipso facto be "wrong", or at the very least, "less correct".
How does that follow? Theists, like everybody else, have myths about alien otherworlds.
>To put it mildly! Not to say, wrongly... I double-checked this, and
>AR is pretty darn clear that there is _one_ Linnaean species name of
>horse.
A God Learner taxonomy. 'nuff said.
--Peter Metcalfe
--__--__--
Powered by hypermail