>> What do we gain by deliberately making gloranthan humans inhuman...
> I think it was Greg who suggested that humans in Glorantha either did
> not have DNA or didn't pass it onto their offspring. In my view the=20
> former makes them non-human...
What the heck does "having DNA" have to do with whether or not you're = human?
This is gibbering science-run-mad, and I'll have none of it!
My friend Simon's paragraph (which I rudely axed above) was spot-on.
I have always opposed the absurd SimGloranthan approach to =
world-building,
and I will continue to do so.
Cheers, Nick
--__--__--
Powered by hypermail