>
>I can see several possible changes :
>
>1. I can make this fully moderated, and only allow posts which match some
>set of rules that we agree to as to what constitutes an "acceptable" post.
The chances of us all agreeing are fairly slim to start with, so I think
that one is a none starter... It would also make the lsit even slower
for those complaining about turnround times
>2. I can tell off and (if needed) moderate those posters who continuously
>post overly dull messages. This would probably be in response to a number
>of complaints from other list members.
Almost as awkward, in some ways. People in the past have taken discussions that got too heated or "nit-picky" off line if there were only two or three people arguing, though so it is not completely unworkable
>3. I can fiddle the software so that all messages come in a bunch (normally
>once a day), but in either digest or individual format as desired. This
>*WILL* involve a lot more work on my part...
This would appear to solve the "all or nothing" Digest problem - Doesn't bother me much either way though
>4. I can open it up totally, a la HQ-RPG.
I'm fairly neutral about this one too, Personally it would only be of use to me if it had some form of Web interface, but I am sure that others would prefer it.
>5. I can leave things as they are. We have over a hundred more members than
>HQ-RPG, so presumably I'm doing something right...
>
not telling them how to unsubscribe ;)
-- +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Tim Ellis EMail tim_at_timellis.demon.co.uk | | What is the use of a book without pictures or conversations? | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ --__--__--
Powered by hypermail