(Message rqd:2) Return-Path:Received: from Holland.Sun.COM (sunnl) by homeland.Holland.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04422; Wed, 2 Jun 93 17:16:12 +0200 Received: from glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM by Holland.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1e) id AA23645; Wed, 2 Jun 93 17:16:03 +0200 Received: by glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04561; Wed, 2 Jun 93 17:15:13 +0200 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 93 17:15:13 +0200 Message-Id: <9306021515.AA04561@glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM> From: RuneQuest-Request@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (RQ Digest Maintainer) To: RuneQuest@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (Daily automated RQ-Digest) Reply-To: RuneQuest@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (RuneQuest Daily) Subject: RuneQuest Daily, Wed, 02 Jun 1993, part 1 Precedence: junk Status: O The RuneQuest Daily and RuneQuest Digest deal with the subjects of Avalon Hill's RPG and Greg Stafford's world of Glorantha. Send submissions and followup to "RuneQuest@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM", they will automatically be included in a next issue. Try to change the Subject: line from the default Re: RuneQuest Daily... on replying. Selected articles may also appear in a regular Digest. If you want to submit articles to the Digest only, contact the editor at RuneQuest-Digest-Editor@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM. Send enquiries and Subscription Requests to the editor: RuneQuest-Request@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (Henk Langeveld) --------------------- From: malcolm@num-alg-grp.co.uk (Malcolm Cohen) Subject: RQ3 sorcery patching Message-ID: <14142.9306011519@jupiter.nag.co.uk> Date: 1 Jun 93 15:19:45 GMT X-RQ-ID: 909 > For non-Gloranthan games we want the magic system to resonate with our > stories and legends, thus imparting the right "feel" to magic, and to fit > logically in the world-system of the game Luckily this is not incompatible Actually this depends on what sort of campaign one is running, and if running a campaign on several planes, the differing physical (magical) laws on each plane. This leads to changes in several parts of the magic system, not just sorcery. For instance, the "aether" in my world is "magically noisy" (like static on a radio) so that one requires an above-average POW characteristic to be able to manipulate magic at all (and even higher POW to be able to create magical effects at a distance rather than at close range). This affects all types of magic, even Spirit Magic which is otherwise more or less unchanged from RQ3. > For story purposes, magic should enhance the story without overwhelmingly > dominating everything. When magic is totally dominant, the story gets > so far away from the real world that we lose the ability to identify well > with the characters. Of course all these are your personal goals; it can definitely suit the story to have magic dominant, giving a different style of story. > Problems with RQ III Sorcery The problems I have with RQ3 sorcery are: Free INT -- does not have the right "feel", effects are not nice Intensity skill -- chance of casting a spell of intensities >1 is the same for intensity 2 as for intensity 20. Duration skill -- chance of casting a spell of duration 1 year is the same as for 20 minutes. The basic solution to this is to allow any manipulation of the spells characteristics, not limited by "Free INT". Further, I consider each MP-worth's of manipulation (both increased intensity, increased range and increased duration) to increase the difficulty of the spell by 5% (i.e. reduce the spell-casting success roll). I have had to basically rewrite the sorcery spell-list because it contains spells which should be impossible in my world and also misses out many effects (or has them being too expensive) which should be there. This is a straight-forward alteration to provide the desired atmosphere etc. for the campaign. Even the spells which I have kept I often do not like much, e.g. Damage Resistance which is very "brittle" (either the mage is totally protected or not protected at all, depending on whether he is lucky!) and practically worthless at low intensity. -- ...........................Malcolm Cohen, NAG Ltd., Oxford, U.K. (malcolm@nag.co.uk) --------------------- From: curtiss@netcom.com (Curtis Shenton) Subject: Re: RuneQuest Daily, Tue, 01 Jun 1993, part 1 Message-ID: <9306011655.AA04412@netcom2.netcom.com> Date: 1 Jun 93 16:55:14 GMT X-RQ-ID: 910 > > From: P.A.Snow@gdr.bath.ac.uk (P A Snow) > Subject: Where's the Magic? > Message-ID: <9306011228.AA01195@Sun.COM> > Date: 1 Jun 93 12:27:46 GMT > X-RQ-ID: 905 > > Paul Snow here. > > In response to Paul Reilly's excellent comments on Sorcery I would like to bring > another aspect to be considered into the discussion. This bolis down to :- > > How "magical" do you want magic/sorcery to feel? > > The current rules for cults and shmanism do work well but ultimately lead to a > world view where magic is technology. This is fine if this is how Glorantha is > seen to be. However, if sorcery in Glorantha is intended to feel like magic in > stories from Earth, it must be made more mysterious and unknown. The latter > parts of Paul R's analysis took sorcery down the Sorcery is technology route. Is Overall I agree with this. I've always hated saying bladesharp 4 or protection 5, etc. It's waaaay to mecahnical. I'd much rather have something like bladesong and roll to see how well I cast/sing/whatever the spell and have my degree of success determine how powerfull it is. So magic would be different each time cast. > this really what people want? If western culture/magic is going to be constructed > to parallel western european development then surely sorcery should be difficult > to master and unpredictable so society has to rely on technology and learning > and move away from sorcery in order to progress. > > Pendragon took magic totally out of player's hands (well originally) so that the > magic of magic could be conveyed by the DM alone. Magic loses its mystery as > soon as the players know the rules and can manipulate them without thought to > their own ends. (I mean without worry rather than without thought there I think) > However, I believe that some of the unpredictability of magic could be > maintained in a well written system. For example, if characters made a skill > roll in order to learn a basuc spell then variations could be imposed on the > spell learnt according to the goodness of the learning roll. Variations need > to be in true game variables that affect play such as range, duration, damage > etc. , not just in irelevant chrome such as color and smell. Then there will > be genuine variation between spells in a group of Sorcerers and players can > not exploit/master the rules by knowing exactly the powers of any NPC > sorceror. This might work to keep doubt and uncertainty about spell effects in > players ind and thus work back to give the mysterious feel of the unknown to > sorcery in general. > > So do you want magic magic or not? > > Paul Snow While I really, really think Gloranthan magic needs to become less mechanical I think SORCERY should be mechanistic. Look who uses it, the dwarves and the godless Brithni(whatever they're called). Sure other western cultures also worship the invisible god much like other cultures worship their gods and maybe sorcery should be less of an exact science for them. But I think the scientific feel of sorcery would work well _if_ the spirit and divine magic was less mechanical. -- Curtis Shenton curtiss@netcom.com internet Too lazy to do a 4@3091 WWIVnet "real" .sig file Currently working on a war of the gods adventure for WotC. If you're intrested email LISTSERV@wizards.com with SUBSCRIBE LOC-L --------------------- From: brandon@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (Brandon Brylawski) Subject: Re: RuneQuest Daily, Fri, 28 May 1993, part 1 Message-ID: <9306011709.AA24048@caldonia.nlm.nih.gov> Date: 1 Jun 93 17:09:47 GMT X-RQ-ID: 911 In his posting on Sorcery, Paul Reilly notes how great an effect on society spells with any significant duration can have, and gives an example of an apprentice sorceror maintaining an army in damage boost. I agree that duration spells should have SEVERE limitations, expecially in Glorantha, where all other magics, spirit and divine, have very little duration (some, like bless crops, have a lasting effect, but those work in a very limited sphere and are part of the culture that they operate in). Additionally, though, I would like to argue strongly for limitations on bound spirits. INT and POW spirits increase one's personal ability to cast Spirit or Sorcerous magic so much that they should be not merely difficult to acquire, but also difficult to maintain. If they have no maintenance cost nor limit on the number of spirits that a person can control, then highly experienced characters will all be festooned with bound spirits. This has some bad effects on the game : first, it creates a great deal of detail for players and GMs to keep track of, as a player or NPC going into combat gives rapid-fire commands to his many bound spirits and they take varying lengths of time to cast their spells; second, it decreases the heroic stature of characters, insofar as it moves the focus of their power away from their personal capabilities to that of items that they carry, reminiscent of item-ridden D&D campaigns; third, in creating a valuable commodity that any powerful opponent will have, it creates a windfall for anyone that defeats such an opponent, and impoverishes anyone defeated but not killed. I strongly urge everyone to adopt rules that encourage personal growth and not acquisition, for the above reasons. I have seen many campaigns damaged by magic goodies that got out of hand. Sample rules that might accomplish some of the above goals : 1. Cut down the INT and Power of most spirits severely. They have been on the spirit plane for a while, perhaps they have attenuated. A POW spirit with 10 points of power effectively doubles one's spirit magic ability, and permits casting a lot of magic without decreasing one's resistance; it should be hard to get. Perhaps spirits should be classed: INT POW Common D3 D3+2 UnCommon 2D3 D6+2 Rare 2D6-1 2D6+1 Very Rare 2D6+2 3D6 with the higher classes having penalties to the chance of finding them, with attendant longer searches and greater risk. 2. POW to bind a spirit = (INT + POW of Spirit) / 3, round UP . 3. A spirit must be re-bound every sacred time; no spirit combat is necessary, but the POW must be repaid. Many cults will accept POW sacrifices from characters during the course of the year, to be repaid at sacred time for this purpose. An alternative is to say that spirit binding lasts one year from the time of binding. Brandon Brylawski --------------------- From: dickmj@postman.essex.ac.uk Subject: Re: Odds and sods Message-ID: <9306011910.AA03535@serdlc14> Date: 1 Jun 93 19:09:58 GMT X-RQ-ID: 912 Loads of stuff to get through and not much time so... Paul R > Instead of the Test of Holiness, perhaps the GM can keep track of "cult >virtues" for the character. This would be easier in a Pendragon-style >system. We use this sort of system. When someone wants to get to the higher ranks of their local cult they have to try and roll beneath these traits, although I prefer to roleplay such things if at all possible. Personality traits are useful for NPC's; recently one of the players did the 'egg joke' on a Storm Kahn. He was pissed and pissed off and was in the middle of a heavy drinking session, so I made him roll an energetic to actually be bothered to chase the character and luckily he fumbled it. The only problem I've found is trying to remember everyone's traits; the other day I caught someone with a cowardly of 17 challenging the local toughs at the village fair!! MOB >Since SUN COUNTY came out I've received a number of letters from players >describing the outcome of the GARHOUND CONTEST (Melisande's Hand). It >got me wondering who the most common winner of the contest is: When we played it (I actually got to play!!) my character BADCOE BROOBANE the stormbull won it. I can't remember who came second, but the NPC's were pretty down the field. Badcoe became totally smitten with Melisande and joined the local Orlanthi's. When he qualified as a Storm Kahn he declined until he could become a Wind Lord at which point he became an associate Storm Kahn. So winning the contest had a profound effect on his life; he settled down (previously he was a Rhino Rider) and changed his primary cult, but he still goes on reckless chaos killing missions given half a chance (much to Melisande's disgust!). POW gain rolls There's been alot of discussion about POW gain rolls so I thought that I'd chuck in my bolg. As well as the normal system, we use a thing called 'CULT POINTS'. People get CP's for doing things that their god likes and lose them by doing things he doesn't like. The more you have, the more difficult it gets to get more of them. We use CP's as a measure of standing in a cult. To become an initiate you must have at least 1. To stay an initiate you must not go negative (although you can go to 0). To become a Rune Level you need 5 and to stay there you must not fall below 3. Each cult point gives +1 Species Max POW - It makes sense that a god will help out his loyal subjects, making POW gain rolls easier and higher POW's possible. In the big scheme of things, a point or 2 of extra POW doesn't really tip the scales too much. 1 attempt at D.I - These attempts must be renewed at a temple just like divine spells. Again, a god is more likely to answer the call of those who do what he wants. +1 to D.I chances - i.e an initiates chance of D.I is POW + CP's on D100. CP's can be lost instead of POW when D.I's are made (as long as you don't fall below the necessary threshold - if you do then you fall down to the level corresponding to your current CP's) Using DI, CP's can never fall below zero, so you can never fall below initiate level. A cult point can be traded in for a 1D3 POW increase (just like a normal POW gain roll but without the risk). This must be performed at a temple and is normally charged for. Cult points have the added advantage of forcing PC's to play in accordance with their cult wishes and not just conveniently forget them when they wish; the reason I developed then in the first place was because I got fed up with a Zorak Zorani death lord who ran away from elves just because they had poisoned weapons. For those without gods e.g sorcerors, I give a minimum 5% chance of a POW gain roll regerdless of POW, so they may increase their species max independently (as sorcerors do). Close Combat And finally, the strike rank debate. RQ IV just about handles closing etc but I've never been happy with the way a VERY quick and tall person with a dagger (min SR 4) can beat a very small and slow person armed with a pike (max SR 8). In fact, you don't even need to be very small! I think the way to get round this is to use figures and, as they suggest in the rules, a hex grid (may I also recommend a white board to draw scenery, etc. on). Using the RQIV engagement rules, as soon as you get within 3 hexes (meters) of a pike wielder, you have to stop unless you can beat your opponent in a maneuver contest. What I would suggest is that weapons have 'ideal ranges' at which they are used; 3m, 2m, 1m and point blank. At each range, there is a multiplier of the weilder's attack and parry skill listed with the weapon with 0 indicating that the weapon can't be used - imagine trying to use a pike while someone is grappling with you. Most weapons rely on a fair amount of leverage and an impact point to deliver damage so when a shorter weapon user closes with a longer weapon user, he is at a very real advantage. However, with many weapons, especially one handed weapons, you can still use the other end of your weapon e.g the pommel or butt, to hit the enemy so at some range all weapons except SR 3 weapons should do the same damage e.g 1D3. Naturally, some consideration as to HOW a weapon is used should be included; you can shorten your grip on a quaterstaff quite quickly so that it is effective a quite a few ranges. An example of a few weapons; Weapon 3m 2m 1m PB Pike x1 x.5 Bt x0 1H sword x0 x0 x1 Bt Dagger x0 x0 x0 x1 Qtr Staff x0 x1 x1 Bt Kite shield x1 x1 x1 x0 Buckler x1 x1 x1 x1 Where 'Bt' means you have to use the butt of your weapon. Using this system means that weapon SR's are irrelevant,a ll that matters is your SIZ and DEX. I'd also say that the modifiers to attack and parry also apply to DEX and SIZ, so someone wielding a dagger has much more chance of knifing you in the back while grappling with you than you have of hitting him with the pommel of your sword reagardless of how quick you are. Closing with an enemy requires a beating your opponent in a manouver contest. This takes a misc action to perform. If your enemy is at your ideal weapon length i.e at the x1 range, but you aren't at theirs, then they must decalre their actions first; the person who has the advantage can better anticipate their adversarie's moves. Comments anybody? -Arganth --------------------- From: f6ri@midway.uchicago.edu (charles gregory fried) Subject: Re: RuneQuest Daily, Sat, 29 May 1993, part 1 Message-ID: Date: 1 Jun 93 18:27:08 GMT X-RQ-ID: 913 A few words about the 'combat sense' skill I proposed several postings back and which Paul Reilly brought up today. I originally mentioned this skill in response to someone's question about how to get PCs to use more of their combat skills. We all know players who get *really* good with one weapon and slog out each combat in the same old predictable way. It'd be nice to find some way to encourage those swahbuckling Three Musketeer combats -- but who wants to head-butt, kick or pull a curtain down over an enemy when he's got 115% in bastard sword to use instead?! 'Combat sense' is a skill that allows combatants to survey a combat situation and then employ unusual tactics at a considerable advantage. Someone (sorry, I forget who!) quite reasonably said something to the effect of: "'Combat sense'?! Ach! Phooey! Another skill to clog up character sheets! Away with it -- and 'Maneuver' too while yer at it!" Fiar enough. I don't much care for Maneuver either -- just use a DEX roll. But the question is, how do we encourage more interesting (and realistic?!) combats? I'm open to suggestions! (And btw,in my campaign, Combat Sense is a special skill available only in combat-oriented cults. Each use of it delays action by 1SR and permits the user to gain a general idea of an opponents skill level in a weapon, OR allows the user to predict the opponent's intended action so that the user may then attempt an _appropriate_ surprise move.) -- Greg Fried