TTrotsky:
> A benefit compared with being permanently full? Pull the other one... ;-)
I don't see your point. Are you saying it should be x1.5 permanently within the glowline? Why not x2? That would be even better. Or - wait - how about x10? How stupid of the Lunars not to make it x10 permanently!
As I see it, the glowline smooths out the bumps and troughs. You can't level a bumpy field without lowering the bumps. As it is, the net effect raises the average, so I really don't see that there is any ground for complaint.
Philip Hibbs http://www.snark.freeserve.co.uk/ Opinions expressed may not even be my own, let alone those of any organisations, nations, species, or schools of thought to which I may be affiliated.
Powered by hypermail