From: Keith Nellist in reply to Peter Metcalphe
> > I did notice in their description of what would be in the > > 2nd edition rules the absence of mysticism. > Looks like they've been refuted?
>From me in reply to Wulf Corbett > > There's also notes that Sorcery is modified, Animism rewritten. > Maybe someone refuted mysticism.
Bugger. I hate it when someone else gets in first with the joke.