DD on MM:
> Some argue for a reading by the table. Only the Lose/Lose case has a
> Mastery special case. Others argue that both have failed, so it's
> treated as if both had succeeded (which would mean Oskul forfeits
> nothing, and Urgrain forfeits 3x).
That latter was definitely not the intent of the rule. Perhaps the phrasing could indeed be improved, since the gist of the idea, as RR says, isn't to "improve" anyone's result, but just to avoid break the tie implied by the lose/lose result, AKA the drunken master standoff.
Powered by hypermail