Re: Augmentation again

From: wulfcorbett <wulfc_at_...>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 08:46:13 -0000

> I myself have debated using 8, and the only real reason is that it's
> "harder to divide by 8 than 5."
> That seems pretty flimsy, and the 2nd ed may well have 8 in the end.

I'd still vote for 10 (assuming there's a vote), as easier to apply by a quick glimpse. However, I'd be happy rounding UP, which would help low abilities be more effective, or even round normally.

Wulf

Powered by hypermail