Re: Re: Augmentation again

From: Peter Larsen <plarsen_at_...>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:55:11 -0600


At 8:46 AM +0000 2/8/02, wulfcorbett wrote:
>
>> I myself have debated using 8, and the only real reason is that it's
>> "harder to divide by 8 than 5."
>> That seems pretty flimsy, and the 2nd ed may well have 8 in the end.
>
>I'd still vote for 10 (assuming there's a vote), as easier to apply
>by a quick glimpse. However, I'd be happy rounding UP, which would
>help low abilities be more effective, or even round normally.

        Using 10 and rounding up will cause the same problem (13 and 17 are interchangable), only you will be choosing between +2 augments.

Peter Larsen

Powered by hypermail